We have noticed for some time now and so far behaviors responsibility of certain pharmaceutical sites theoretically "open" online where colleagues could (also theoretically) free speech, which show the clearest evidence of censorship when he tries to express is known that is not aligned in their ranks.
One of them of great importance (according to their self-promotion) in the province of Buenos Aires and the other as a place of "meeting" of colleagues autoconvocados nonconforming by the reality of the sector in the province of Santa Fe
" What commonalities and differences we can make?
The first one we know and have spent some time recruiting colleagues fragile nature and political position, as a restraint to calm the waters and entertainment, as a head wash to avoid further questioning inefficient leaderships say that today drive the direction of the pharmacy profession.
The second difference appears to be an escape route for complaints that generates such a grim reality of our beloved profession ... But everything is done anonymously ... It's amazing what fear can do, but it is an indisputable fact. The strange thing is that they prevent expression of that same channel to colleagues by name, as many are accustomed to handling. All this despite the fact that we who make up this modest group are not identified with any political faction or even having supported from the beginning to the initiative of self-summoned for this purpose. But ... enough to have issued any comment on any opportunity to criticize the modus operandi of the mother entity behind which are listed in the column, and for that we are totally censored from then on to express in this medium.
Now ... How does seem both sites?
Simple ... He who does not think like them or show some attitude of "rebellious" about what they advocate, is no longer welcome. In other words, or think like them or you're out, without a review.
Surprisingly (or not so) both groups are politically very close to Crow.
A's see ... What do we do agree on this? .. Intolerance, censorship, stiffness, dictatorial attitudes, thumbs downs, brainwashing, anonymous attacks, insults, threats, lying on ground strokes from the back ...
Yes, inevitably leads to the most tragic and sad time in our history as a country.
If we add up individual cases as they were lead to the antecedent (moral self-condemnation for not calling) to have been instigators and participants in making the school building in question and attempted forcible removal of officers on duty (not to call "blow") occurred several years ago ago.
The worst thing is when someone with no shoulders to bear it goes "ethical" or "morally correct" as those who once despised, abused and derided colleagues who work with the president claiming social work that these people are given, thus were rejected because they said they only wanted to pharmaceutical chemists because it was "right." Unusually few days after it is known that many of those abused colleagues were contacted by telephone by a known and faithful representative of this group to ask for support, signed by the early removal order (previously described) of the current authorities of the school. If unbelievable, but true ... Far can someone really unconscionable is unthinkable ...
Again we thank you and good use of the opportunity it gives us the simple fact be truly independent of all the powers that (is there anyone else?), And translate that wealth for the benefit of the profession ... How? ... as we always say CALLING THINGS BY THEIR NAME WITHOUT TIES.
At that fit is sac ... you put it ...
Happy 2011 to all pharmacists practicing law everyday with respect for others.
0 comments:
Post a Comment