The National Chamber of Appeals for the job, I think the fact that a medical, service and other tasks lend intituciones while he was tied to the defendant. This does not allow to conclude that professional work was only independently, as the exclusive tipificante not a note of the employment contract.
The chamber notes that the plaintiff could not derive the performance of the contract work to another physician, but had to be done personally.
This record was rejected the application at first instance, but the House Education revoke that decision, with full factual basis and according to law.
So always remember to consult a labor lawyer.
Www.laboralonline.com.ar
0 comments:
Post a Comment