Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Proxy To Stream South Park

wrong this time ... Editorial

Unfortunately and as we anticipated back in the beginning of last September, pharmaceutical colleagues would let their guard down by distracting maneuvers generated by the leadership in some cases, threats and intimidation in others.
was so obvious that it was ridiculous to whom we integrate this publishing group, which others do not realize, or simply deny it descreyera that. O were very naive not to see or obviously were "mats" that respond daily to those same leaders and to deny it.
is true that there has been a huge increase in "virtual" group, especially Facebook, colleagues who propose ideas, discuss issues and attempt to unify criteria in pursuit of our profession mortally wounded.
At this point, I just think he does not want to see, do not realize in each group characters who are "healthy" and condescending with the intent to "real" save the profession and who are "sent" by "of up "to spy, report and sow discord rispideces creating and altering the good climate of discussion that commonly occur around the issues.
Luckily I'm already very tanned with all this, and used to discredit colleagues by saying "believe only" or full of pride pour comments. I have also received anonymous calls threatening the traditional, the messages via email and Facebook some of these anonymous and some not. Believe me
the authors of these maneuvers that do nothing but keep giving me the reason: they are mere disposable objects used by the leaders of shifts while they continue to serve to embody this unfortunate, unworthy and miserable task: to be neither more nor less than negligible "buttons "(as they are called in our neighborhood).
I love to have in front of me, face to face, to know how to handle in person, the trench is the anonymous virtual media. I do not think undisguised are equally "bold." Moreover, not even think they have the ability to carry out a good foundation debate, soundly established by the real experience of the profession, having gone through all sectors and branches of pharmaceutical concern. They have demonstrated writing only attacks, they never read a single idea, a project or sound analysis of the situation.
Something very similar happens with the leaders in power who never agreed to debate. Why? If the sedative pill to swallow to make them as vulnerable and innocent collegiate is far more effective and expose them much less its myriad shortcomings both ethical and administrative. Meanwhile
the profession is bleeding, mortally wounded at the sight of pharmaceutical inoperative as we begin to fire the remainder of a nearly defunct profession, entertain us in the waiting room of this true "intensive" reading or writing articles totally superfluous, empty, or perhaps no importance (diseases, Cadeneros from other countries, new drugs, views political, etc.) if we consider that not apply once our profession has died.
wish I really mistake the latter. Hopefully stop being silent and we will, through reasonable thought we were supposedly endowed humans realize that we must leave torpor and rebel against this system is unconscionable that we bury every day. Your silence will
cruel news that once again I was right in the forecast, and will be really sad because it will give free rein (even more) to top to continue their submissions.
I, as I always say, I will continue until the end, calling things by their name and exposing those who have to explain ... at any cost ...

0 comments:

Post a Comment