What contract? A common employee or a pharmacist? At the end they always win ... There Is it coincidence or causality that more employees request the pharmacy, pharmacy students pharmacists that true?
How many pharmacists are covering these times that open pharmacies in each locality?
Are they enough?
"working in pharmacies and even more run time, which operate 24 hours. have at least one pharmacist is always present?
"In addition to serving as required, may supervise non-professional employees?
believe that the answers to each of these questions is more than obvious.
population's health is at stake not only when drugs are sold at a kiosk. In these cases also. And curiously (or not so) is not doing anything.
analysis is quite complex but here are some details:
* You might think that the employer, looking at his own expense, take an employee that "in theory" it costs less than a pharmacist, taking risks and exposing themselves to very serious problems that this can lead (faults to inspections, bad practice, etc.). * On the other hand
we also know that the assets of a professional employee of a pharmaceutical and not far from each other (thanks to the passivity of the colleges and put our noses to the professional level unions useless), so that it could be concluded that almost the same cost, without much thought, it should absolutely take pharmaceuticals.
How is it possible that they live two conclusions as antagonistic to each other?
The answer, at least ours is simple: Cadeneros, franchisors, hidden and pharmacy owners are betting big on both employees and pharmaceutical professionals but at a rate inconsistent with a claim itself health services such as pharmacy. In this way continue to influence both their own fees, and have historically been "very close" to negotiations (and we never use words like "fixing" or "trans") with the same unions and colleges with whom they should maintain maximum possible harmony, so that numbers close to one side.
unions continue to receive contributions from employees and pharmacists (and unlawful forced the latter) and the schools continue to receive their registration fees by professionals who "say" group.
Who lost in all this?
The community which is increasingly exposed to voices ignorant and unskilled hands handling your health (and here no longer talk about Kiosquero).
Also, and again, the very professional pharmacist, who as we have grown accustomed to his absolute passivity, fear, inaction and complete lack of attitude to meet and discuss with their peers to confront those who should, finds herself less and less valued, needed and recognized as a health professional. Finally
us, that we express through this medium, because we do not give any other place, perhaps because we are absolutely front and the naked truth as the only flag. Because they still support their everyday actions, that the only way to silence who think they have, is threats, flaming, insulting, disqualified, trying to get all dirty from behind, recommending to all colleagues fragile thought and character not to get involved with those who think so , which does not allow us to exercise, do not give us work place, so being marginalized in the profession. Ever sincerely believed, to be spectators of these acts of meanness and inferiority complexes, to the point of avoiding confrontation, knowing losers in the debate, and be aware that you missed all those who trusted them and change the wrongs for his back which cowardly and treacherous stab. They have their rearguard so dirty that more and more people avoid not only the debate but also the greeting, look to the eyes, the living minimum. They can not against the truth, make water and collapse at a time before we were and will always be "imcomprables" with "snake oil" and superficialities which anyway will end up "eating" the vast majority of colleagues later still blinded by their own inability or convenience, even knowing that this "I shit on my colleague" means inevitably, sooner or a disadvantage.
As ever express through these channels, even leaving the side of the practice of the profession, absolutely ignored and neglected, we will have even better insight and strength to continue analyzing, discussing and denouncing especially as we have done so far, all actions that continue to grow this true terminal tumor diagnosed with more than critical, the death sentence to our profession for many years.
