procedural delay, no doubt, is one of the scourges that undoubtedly distorts the tutelage of, human rights of citizens, so we have, that Venezuela is sufficient to note the relationship of causes that are elucidated in criminal courts, to find that the main cause of violation of the right to justice.
Article 26 of the Constitution of the Republic Bolivariana de Venezuela (Constitution) refers to the irregularity of undue delays in criminal proceedings, we note that in your head, says: "(...) to obtain a prompt and appropriate decision (...)" In its first part, to ensure justice "without undue delay so (...)", as guarantees citizens that justice will be swift and effective.
In line with Article 334 CRBV, states that "(...) the judges or judges of the Republic, within the scope of its powers and in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution and the law are in the obligation to ensure the integrity of this Constitution (...) "
meets Is this premise? Obviously NO.
As already mentioned are JUDGES calls for GUARANTEE it happen. But the fact is that Judges are the main violators of constitutional rule, using arguments for non-ambiguous pronouncement effective in many cases. I have knowledge and expertise to the workings of the criminal courts have problems such as assigning secretary, marshals travelers and vehicles to practice notices, which leads to lack of control and delay the same, lack of transfer of suspects and defendants when required, delay in conducting preliminary hearings and trials by the excessive number of events set for the same day.
Within the framework of the above observations, no doubt bend the effective functioning of the courts but there are simple cases as special hearing to discuss the delivery of the vehicle did not even know where the file, not even assigned the date of completion of the same, leaving no other choice than the applicant to make a constitutional protection for things like them.
is evident that in consequence, creates new human conflicts. Being the worst part of this undue delay, (moral damage, property damage, prisoner without trial, etc.). In my opinion there are several reasons in INSTITUTIONAL ORDER originating procedural delays. It is obvious that overcoming is achieved undue delay of legal certainty.
If we go beyond what we mention in criminal and civil cases, the criticisms are the same, because they are hard known for all delays without any understanding unexplained, not go too far right here in Valle de la Pascua, civil courts are irrelevant, for ongoing medical repose of the judges, leaving litigants without justice.
then I wonder Will I need to educate judges about the need to prosecute cases within strict time periods provided for each case?
"A long time justice is not justice"
0 comments:
Post a Comment