Today I have a story that I think will be interesting for its undeniable force in regard to our current professional and because I guess I will paint the picture on the decision-making when choosing whether or head down to leave a job in which one sees convincingly that abut underpaid and delayed.
A pharmacist who works at a drugstore in a major city of the country (Argentina) than when he had to sit down and renegotiate their professional fees with the manager of the company with questions having to do with common sense (inflation, constant price adjustments, increased cost of living, etc.) only received a negative kind of "disguised" as a pretext or excuse. Read: "Look, we entered into a contract with a definite number for one year, I have no the blame for inflation, blah, blah, blah ... at most I can compensate you with 10% for July and August 2010
...". If we also note that this pharmacist was receiving his fee (against invoice issued as monotributistas, ie all amounts had retirement , social work and registered at your expense), completely out of place, and even months after the agreement, no choice but to describe this situation as absolutely shameful and unbearable, and not given another chance to start immediately colleague departure.
Even the manager of the company, had the least common sense to realize that this drugstore was open, enabled and working thanks to your pharmacist who is the Head Coach of it and without it, none of this would exist and all employees would even work. So it is very sad that this professional realizes that when making adjustments, whether their own fees which fall first, denying the corresponding increase.
On the other hand, and be a pharmacist word that does not erase his arm he writes by hand, did not go to the unions, as they always considered non-professional pharmacists, and thus claiming lived particular negotiation and staff of each pharmacist to your employer, in defense of a decent minimum fee, and the passivity and corruption of the professional associations that should have been those who regulate. In other words, was true to his principles and preferred to die in his, with his words as the flag clean and perhaps a utopian ideology. Yet it has been heavily criticized by his colleagues in print like this in the case of arrogant among other epithets because he blamed himself saying not to give in because I had a good economic situation, other chances to work and another endless string of ridiculous allegations who deserve make judgments without knowing the other person. Nothing could be further from reality, this accusation that this colleague go through a good economic situation and "is tied cow", but hey, it was never easy to fight against cerradez of mind or thought blocking of Argentina and in particular the pharmacist. And it will look back the history of this country and especially in this profession. Finally
. comment that this colleague is a very close person who writes these lines, and undoubtedly hope that their situation will straighten and fix for the welfare of himself, his family (with a baby that is coming) and the whole community of pharmaceutical professionals.
Hopefully this short and simple story leaves us something ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment