obligation is known that stops food from parents to child turned 21 years old. So
jurisprudence has repeatedly said that: "With the majority of the fed was operated" ipso jure "the cessation of the maintenance on it. Is that minor child's food full stop when it- among other cases - reached adulthood, resulting in unnecessary petition in the matter. (art. 126, 130, 265, 267 Civil Code) " (C. Second Apel. In Civ, Room 1, La Plata, 05.12.2000, 94248 RSD cause-330-00, Juba. Abstract 832. 3). But there is a fallode
K., CA c / K., GM s / Food Incident Termination Fee "- CHAMBER CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL Necochea (Buenos Aires) - 04/11/2008 has said:" In the case of parent material assistance to their children has an autonomous character that originated in the duties inherent in custody, having their cause in the solidarity that it is for family members, including the completion of the education of children, according to the condition and fortune of the parents as Edicta the standard under consideration. Having the son started college during the minority, the food aid might be extended until the end of it at a reasonable age, or decides to abandon ... "In this case I think the judge within 25 years.
It is not a function related of parental authority that extends alimony, but it is a function of solidarity and the quality of relationship, but depends on the opinion of each judge and the circumstances of the case.
We welcome your opinions and consultations Dr
Nieva
http://www.inmueblelegal.com.ar/
0 comments:
Post a Comment