In this country, such a profession ... (Sticks and chips).
As has historically occurred at the level of national government in Argentina, also in our profession and its leadership in power, has tried to silence, stop, stop growing, fouling and despestrigiar (always behind) to all those colleagues who have pursued an ideal of healthy profession and for all, enabling and differentiating all those who bet on the mediocrity blowing smoke and trying to keep us entertained with trifles, while the profession to benefit looted of its own coffers. We have always irritated that we, who question, those who propose different ways, which expose them to all and we call things by their name, without detours.
Are not they too like the last 20 years of our country and our beloved profession of pharmacy? To my humble opinion, identical ... If you do not end up with the "sandwich and coke x one vote" or maybe a little more "fashion" at the counters of pharmacies, a "mirror of color x one vote, nothing will improve and inevitably disappear as we are , health professionals, so far, not much more, irreplaceable.
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Friday, September 24, 2010
Pirate Figure For Labelling
My best wishes to the invitation of 25/09/2010 ... The usual endless
All the success and best wishes to my colleagues in the call for tomorrow, Saturday 25 / 9 in the Capital. Hopefully serve as a starting point for something different, where virgin pharmaceutical services to be able to impose their voices be heard, apart from the passivity and fear that have been brought up here as a backpack paralyzing. But colleagues who are unconnected with the powers of any kind. No more verbal anesthesia of the current leaders of COFA, Fefara, Schools, Chambers, Mandatory or unions.
Beyond not attend such an event for reasons known to some, I let them know that although certain "leaders" on duty can assume that my " non-attendance "may mean" water down "or" weaken "my policy change, calling the spade a spade and keep questioning everything in my opinion he deserves it, quite the contrary will continue with all the people who accompanied me, especially my latitudes, pointing to a real "Pharmaceutical Reconstruction."
All the success and best wishes to my colleagues in the call for tomorrow, Saturday 25 / 9 in the Capital. Hopefully serve as a starting point for something different, where virgin pharmaceutical services to be able to impose their voices be heard, apart from the passivity and fear that have been brought up here as a backpack paralyzing. But colleagues who are unconnected with the powers of any kind. No more verbal anesthesia of the current leaders of COFA, Fefara, Schools, Chambers, Mandatory or unions.
Beyond not attend such an event for reasons known to some, I let them know that although certain "leaders" on duty can assume that my " non-attendance "may mean" water down "or" weaken "my policy change, calling the spade a spade and keep questioning everything in my opinion he deserves it, quite the contrary will continue with all the people who accompanied me, especially my latitudes, pointing to a real "Pharmaceutical Reconstruction."
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
S3 Savage 2000 64mb Driver Xp
"washed hands" ... and "brain" ...
This is what we published in the latest edition of its monthly magazine the College of Pharmacists of Santa Fe - Follow Circuscripción.
reflection What they deserve?
to me personally it is an ultra-light bleaching which until now have been feeling on the part of those authorities. The absolute lack of position around the theme "pharmaceutical professional fees." And what is even worse, the referral of the case to a union that nothing should have to do with our pharmacists, but dealing with "group and defend" the pharmacy employees "no pharmaceuticals."
But hey, this is what you get. Like repeatedly heard from their own mouths, now "bleached" in its editorial. Will they believe that this maybe the lava or exemption from blame?
Well on the contrary, does nothing to demonstrate that instead of SET and defend the professional fees, give us hands and feet tied to what they "suggest" a union that the only thing aim is to have the largest number of pharmacy chains or franchises disguised as false properties, so as to absorb as much of pharmacists in "relationship of dependency," probably under-employed and working in deplorable conditions, quietly, in silence, without raising their voices and allowing them to close the "numbers" Cadeneros both their employers and the union of these capitas depends ... And not forgetting the "contribution" to the college tuition that will generate ...
A true and utter lack of commitment to the profession and a treacherous abandonment of pharmaceutical colleague by this time not even see these meager fees shamefully "they" suggest in this institutional review.
Is it worth so little space on one sheet of paper in the journal in question because the rest of the hand is more important?
Will the entertainment, celebrations and recreational activities that promote it must be as much part of the issue because his colleague, but can not "entertain" and could begin practicing the dangerous activity "think"?
As usual, too many unanswered questions ... It's what we're used to ...
Maybe someday someone else start asking questions ...
Or maybe one day begin to appear the answers ...
This is what we published in the latest edition of its monthly magazine the College of Pharmacists of Santa Fe - Follow Circuscripción.
reflection What they deserve?
to me personally it is an ultra-light bleaching which until now have been feeling on the part of those authorities. The absolute lack of position around the theme "pharmaceutical professional fees." And what is even worse, the referral of the case to a union that nothing should have to do with our pharmacists, but dealing with "group and defend" the pharmacy employees "no pharmaceuticals."
But hey, this is what you get. Like repeatedly heard from their own mouths, now "bleached" in its editorial. Will they believe that this maybe the lava or exemption from blame?
Well on the contrary, does nothing to demonstrate that instead of SET and defend the professional fees, give us hands and feet tied to what they "suggest" a union that the only thing aim is to have the largest number of pharmacy chains or franchises disguised as false properties, so as to absorb as much of pharmacists in "relationship of dependency," probably under-employed and working in deplorable conditions, quietly, in silence, without raising their voices and allowing them to close the "numbers" Cadeneros both their employers and the union of these capitas depends ... And not forgetting the "contribution" to the college tuition that will generate ...
A true and utter lack of commitment to the profession and a treacherous abandonment of pharmaceutical colleague by this time not even see these meager fees shamefully "they" suggest in this institutional review.
Is it worth so little space on one sheet of paper in the journal in question because the rest of the hand is more important?
Will the entertainment, celebrations and recreational activities that promote it must be as much part of the issue because his colleague, but can not "entertain" and could begin practicing the dangerous activity "think"?
As usual, too many unanswered questions ... It's what we're used to ...
Maybe someday someone else start asking questions ...
Or maybe one day begin to appear the answers ...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)